We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Economics > General Economics

Title: Hassling as Money Burning: A Note

Authors: Liqun Liu
Abstract: Why do states sometimes permit military activities that are minor, costly, and yet inconclusive? We argue that these low-level conflicts known as "hassling" are useful commitment tactics to prevent preventive wars. While states have incentives to cooperatively and permanently refrain from hassling, they recognize that doing so might beget a preventive war due to the rising power's inability to make appeasing offers prior to the power shift. Maintaining the hassling activities that might persist after a greater war would reduce the spoils of the victor, thus dampening the declining power's preventive war incentive. As such, costly hassling activities are efficient in the sense that they preclude costlier large-scale wars.
Subjects: General Economics (econ.GN)
Cite as: arXiv:2111.15598 [econ.GN]
  (or arXiv:2111.15598v1 [econ.GN] for this version)

Submission history

From: Liqun Liu [view email]
[v1] Tue, 30 Nov 2021 17:45:58 GMT (13kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.