We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:


References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Computation and Language

Title: Two Contrasting Data Annotation Paradigms for Subjective NLP Tasks

Abstract: Labelled data is the foundation of most natural language processing tasks. However, labelling data is difficult and there often are diverse valid beliefs about what the correct data labels should be. So far, dataset creators have acknowledged annotator subjectivity, but rarely actively managed it in the annotation process. This has led to partly-subjective datasets that fail to serve a clear downstream use. To address this issue, we propose two contrasting paradigms for data annotation. The descriptive paradigm encourages annotator subjectivity, whereas the prescriptive paradigm discourages it. Descriptive annotation allows for the surveying and modelling of different beliefs, whereas prescriptive annotation enables the training of models that consistently apply one belief. We discuss benefits and challenges in implementing both paradigms, and argue that dataset creators should explicitly aim for one or the other to facilitate the intended use of their dataset. Lastly, we conduct an annotation experiment using hate speech data that illustrates the contrast between the two paradigms.
Comments: Accepted at NAACL 2022 (Main Conference)
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2112.07475 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2112.07475v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

Submission history

From: Paul Röttger [view email]
[v1] Tue, 14 Dec 2021 15:38:22 GMT (235kb,D)
[v2] Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:27:02 GMT (237kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.