We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

astro-ph.CO

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Astrophysics > Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Title: Cosmological Results from the RAISIN Survey: Using Type Ia Supernovae in the Near Infrared as a Novel Path to Measure the Dark Energy Equation of State

Abstract: Type Ia supernovae (SN Ia) are more nearly standard candles when measured in the near-infrared (NIR) than in the optical. With this motivation, from 2012-2017 we embarked on the RAISIN program with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) to obtain rest-frame NIR light curves for a cosmologically distant sample of 37 SN Ia ($0.2<z<0.7$) discovered by Pan-STARRS and the Dark Energy Survey. By comparing higher-$z$ HST data with 43 SN Ia at $z<0.1$ observed in the NIR by the Carnegie Supernova Project, we construct a Hubble diagram exclusively from NIR observations to pursue a unique avenue to constrain the dark energy equation of state parameter, $w$. We analyze the dependence of the full set of Hubble residuals on the SN Ia host galaxy mass and find Hubble residual steps of size $\sim$0.08-0.12 mag with 2- to 3-$\sigma$ significance depending on the method and step location used. Combining our NIR sample with Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) constraints, we find $1+w=-0.04\pm0.12$ (statistical$+$systematic errors). The largest systematic errors are the redshift-dependent SN selection biases and the properties of the NIR mass step. We also use these data to measure ${\rm H}_0=75.4\pm 2.4~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$ from stars with geometric distance calibration in the hosts of 8 SNe Ia observed in the NIR versus ${\rm H}_0=65.9\pm3.4~{\rm km~s^{-1}~Mpc^{-1}}$ using an inverse distance ladder approach tied to Planck. Using optical data we find $1+w=-0.01\pm0.09$ and with optical and NIR data combined, we find $1+w=0.03\pm0.08$; these shifts of up to $\sim$0.07 in $w$ could point to inconsistency in the optical versus NIR SN models. There will be many opportunities to improve this NIR measurement and better understand systematic uncertainties through larger low-$z$ samples, new light-curve models, calibration improvements, and eventually building high-$z$ samples from the Roman Space Telescope.
Comments: submitted to ApJ
Subjects: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO); High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena (astro-ph.HE)
Cite as: arXiv:2201.07801 [astro-ph.CO]
  (or arXiv:2201.07801v1 [astro-ph.CO] for this version)

Submission history

From: David Jones [view email]
[v1] Wed, 19 Jan 2022 19:00:00 GMT (5107kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.