We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

q-fin.RM

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Quantitative Finance > Risk Management

Title: Estimating and backtesting risk under heavy tails

Abstract: While the estimation of risk is an important question in the daily business of banking and insurance, many existing plug-in estimation procedures suffer from an unnecessary bias. This often leads to the underestimation of risk and negatively impacts backtesting results, especially in small sample cases. In this article we show that the link between estimation bias and backtesting can be traced back to the dual relationship between risk measures and the corresponding performance measures, and discuss this in reference to value-at-risk, expected shortfall and expectile value-at-risk.
Motivated by the consistent underestimation of risk by plug-in procedures, we propose a new algorithm for bias correction and show how to apply it for generalized Pareto distributions to the i.i.d.\ setting and to a GARCH(1,1) time series. In particular, we show that the application of our algorithm leads to gain in efficiency when heavy tails or heteroscedasticity exists in the data.
Comments: Double submission. Please see arXiv:2010.09937
Subjects: Risk Management (q-fin.RM)
Cite as: arXiv:2201.10454 [q-fin.RM]
  (or arXiv:2201.10454v2 [q-fin.RM] for this version)

Submission history

From: Thorsten Schmidt [view email]
[v1] Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:55:59 GMT (258kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 26 Jan 2022 09:18:12 GMT (0kb,I)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.