We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Numerical Analysis

Title: Sketching Matrix Least Squares via Leverage Scores Estimates

Abstract: We consider the matrix least squares problem of the form $\| \mathbf{A} \mathbf{X}-\mathbf{B} \|_F^2$ where the design matrix $\mathbf{A} \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times r}$ is tall and skinny with $N \gg r$. We propose to create a sketched version $\| \tilde{\mathbf{A}}\mathbf{X}-\tilde{\mathbf{B}} \|_F^2$ where the sketched matrices $\tilde{\mathbf{A}}$ and $\tilde{\mathbf{B}}$ contain weighted subsets of the rows of $\mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{B}$, respectively. The subset of rows is determined via random sampling based on leverage score estimates for each row. We say that the sketched problem is $\epsilon$-accurate if its solution $\tilde{\mathbf{X}}_{\rm \text{opt}} = \text{argmin } \| \tilde{\mathbf{A}}\mathbf{X}-\tilde{\mathbf{B}} \|_F^2$ satisfies $\|\mathbf{A}\tilde{\mathbf{X}}_{\rm \text{opt}}-\mathbf{B} \|_F^2 \leq (1+\epsilon) \min \| \mathbf{A}\mathbf{X}-\mathbf{B} \|_F^2$ with high probability. We prove that the number of samples required for an $\epsilon$-accurate solution is $O(r/(\beta \epsilon))$ where $\beta \in (0,1]$ is a measure of the quality of the leverage score estimates.
Comments: This is detailed and standalone derivation of a result that already appears in (arXiv:2006.16438, Appendix A). arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2006.16438
Subjects: Numerical Analysis (math.NA); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
Cite as: arXiv:2201.10638 [math.NA]
  (or arXiv:2201.10638v1 [math.NA] for this version)

Submission history

From: Brett Larsen [view email]
[v1] Tue, 25 Jan 2022 21:34:06 GMT (24kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.