We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

Title: Calibration with Privacy in Peer Review

Abstract: Reviewers in peer review are often miscalibrated: they may be strict, lenient, extreme, moderate, etc. A number of algorithms have previously been proposed to calibrate reviews. Such attempts of calibration can however leak sensitive information about which reviewer reviewed which paper. In this paper, we identify this problem of calibration with privacy, and provide a foundational building block to address it. Specifically, we present a theoretical study of this problem under a simplified-yet-challenging model involving two reviewers, two papers, and an MAP-computing adversary. Our main results establish the Pareto frontier of the tradeoff between privacy (preventing the adversary from inferring reviewer identity) and utility (accepting better papers), and design explicit computationally-efficient algorithms that we prove are Pareto optimal.
Comments: 31 pages, 6 figures
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Information Theory (cs.IT)
Cite as: arXiv:2201.11308 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:2201.11308v1 [cs.CR] for this version)

Submission history

From: Wenxin Ding [view email]
[v1] Thu, 27 Jan 2022 03:56:28 GMT (298kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.