We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Rings and Algebras

Title: Another research note

Abstract: Let $L$ be a slim, planar, semimodular lattice (slim means that it does not contain ${\mathsf M}_3$-sublattices). We call the interval $I = [o, i]$ of $L$ \emph{rectangular}, if there are $u_l, u_r \in [o, i] - \{o,i\}$ such that $i = u_l \vee u_r$ and $o = u_l \wedge u_r$ where $u_l$ is to the left of $u_r$.
\emph{The first result}: a rectangular interval of a rectangular lattice is a rectangular lattice. As an application, we get a recent result of G. Cz\'edli.
In a 2017 paper, G. Cz\'edli introduced a very powerful diagram type for slim, planar, semimodular lattices, the \emph{$\mathcal{C}_1$-diagrams}.
We revisit the concept of \emph{natural diagrams} I introduced with E.~Knapp about a dozen years ago. Given a slim rectangular lattice $L$, we construct its natural diagram in one simple step. \emph{The second result} shows that for a slim rectangular lattice, a~natural diagram is the same as a $\mathcal{C}_1$-diagram. Therefore, natural diagrams have all the nice properties of $\mathcal{C}_1$-diagrams.
Comments: Incorporated in a longer paper
Subjects: Rings and Algebras (math.RA)
MSC classes: 06C10
Cite as: arXiv:2201.13343 [math.RA]
  (or arXiv:2201.13343v4 [math.RA] for this version)

Submission history

From: George Grätzer [view email]
[v1] Mon, 31 Jan 2022 16:42:34 GMT (1512kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 7 Feb 2022 18:57:17 GMT (269kb,D)
[v3] Thu, 24 Mar 2022 19:37:18 GMT (0kb,I)
[v4] Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:43:20 GMT (0kb,I)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.