We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

math.ST

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Statistics Theory

Title: Defining a credible interval is not always possible with "point-null'' priors: A lesser-known consequence of the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox

Abstract: In many common situations, a Bayesian credible interval will be, given the same data, very similar to a frequentist confidence interval, and researchers will interpret these intervals in a similar fashion. However, no predictable similarity exists when credible intervals are based on model-averaged posteriors whenever one of the two models under consideration is a so called ``point-null''. Not only can this model-averaged credible interval be quite different than the frequentist confidence interval, in some cases it may be undefinable. This is a lesser-known consequence of the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox and is of particular interest given the popularity of the Bayes factor for testing point-null hypotheses.
Subjects: Statistics Theory (math.ST)
Cite as: arXiv:2210.00029 [math.ST]
  (or arXiv:2210.00029v1 [math.ST] for this version)

Submission history

From: Harlan Campbell [view email]
[v1] Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:08:56 GMT (2079kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.