We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Differential Geometry

Title: Non-symmetric intrinsic Hopf-Lax semigroup vs. intrinsic Lagrangian

Abstract: In this paper, we analyze the 'symmetrized' of the intrinsic Hopf-Lax semigroup introduced by the author in the context of the intrinsically Lipschitz sections in the setting of metric spaces. Indeed, in the usual case, we have that $d(x,y) =d(y,x)$ for any point $x$ and $y$ belong to the metric space $X$; on the other hand, in our intrinsic context, we have that $d(f(x),\pi^{-1} (y)) \ne d(f(y),\pi^{-1} (x)),$ for every $x,y \in X$. Therefore, it is not trivial that we get the same result obtained for the "classical" intrinsic Hopf-Lax semigroup, i.e., the 'symmetrized' Hopf-Lax semigroup is a subsolution of Hamilton-Jacobi type equation. Here, an important observation is that $f$ is just a continuous section of a quotient map $\pi$ and it can not intrinsic Lipschitz.
However, following Evans, the main result of this note is to show that the "new" intrinsic Hopf-Lax semigroup satisfies a suitable variational problem where the functional contained an intrinsic Lagrangian. Hence, we also define and prove some basic properties of the intrinsic Fenchel-Legendre transform of this intrinsic Lagrangian that depends on a continuous section of $\pi$.
Comments: Comments are welcome. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2207.04486
Subjects: Differential Geometry (math.DG); Functional Analysis (math.FA); Metric Geometry (math.MG)
Cite as: arXiv:2211.12822 [math.DG]
  (or arXiv:2211.12822v1 [math.DG] for this version)

Submission history

From: Daniela Di Donato [view email]
[v1] Wed, 23 Nov 2022 10:11:14 GMT (34kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.