We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Category Theory

Title: Fp-projective periodicity

Abstract: The phenomenon of periodicity, discovered by Benson and Goodearl, is linked to the behavior of the objects of cocycles in acyclic complexes. It is known that any flat $\mathsf{Proj}$-periodic module is projective, any fp-injective $\mathsf{Inj}$-periodic module is injective, and any $\mathsf{Cot}$-periodic module is cotorsion. It is also known that any pure $\mathsf{PProj}$-periodic module is pure-projective and any pure $\mathsf{PInj}$-periodic module is pure-injective. Generalizing a result of Saroch and Stovicek, we show that every $\mathsf{FpProj}$-periodic module is weakly fp-projective. The proof is quite elementary, using only a strong form of the pure-projective periodicity and the Hill lemma. More generally, we prove that, in a locally finitely presentable Grothendieck category, every $\mathsf{FpProj}$-periodic object is weakly fp-projective. In a locally coherent category, all weakly fp-projective objects are fp-projective. We also present counterexamples showing that a non-pure $\mathsf{PProj}$-periodic module over a regular finitely generated commutative algebra (or a hereditary finite-dimensional associative algebra) over a field need not be pure-projective.
Comments: LaTeX 2e, 29 pages; v.2: Remark 4.11 and Example 6.9 inserted
Subjects: Category Theory (math.CT); Rings and Algebras (math.RA)
Cite as: arXiv:2212.02300 [math.CT]
  (or arXiv:2212.02300v2 [math.CT] for this version)

Submission history

From: Leonid Positselski [view email]
[v1] Mon, 5 Dec 2022 14:25:08 GMT (25kb)
[v2] Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:05:44 GMT (27kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.