We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Mathematics > Statistics Theory

Title: How to Measure Evidence: Bayes Factors or Relative Belief Ratios?

Abstract: Both the Bayes factor and the relative belief ratio satisfy the principle of evidence and so can be seen to be valid measures of statistical evidence. The question then is: which of these measures of evidence is more appropriate? Certainly Bayes factors are commonly used. It is argued here that there are questions concerning the validity of a current commonly used definition of the Bayes factor and, when all is considered, the relative belief ratio is a much more appropriate measure of evidence. Several general criticisms of these measures of evidence are also discussed and addressed.
Subjects: Statistics Theory (math.ST); Methodology (stat.ME); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2301.08994 [math.ST]
  (or arXiv:2301.08994v1 [math.ST] for this version)

Submission history

From: Michael Evans [view email]
[v1] Sat, 21 Jan 2023 19:27:49 GMT (18kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.