We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.PF

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Electrical Engineering and Systems Science > Systems and Control

Title: Assigning Optimal Integer Harmonic Periods to Hard Real Time Tasks

Abstract: Selecting period values for tasks is a very important step in the design process of a real-time system, especially due to the significance of its impact on system schedulability. It is well known that, under RMS, the utilization bound for a harmonic task set is 100%. Also, polynomial-time algorithms have been developed for response-time analysis of harmonic task sets. In practice, the largest acceptable value for the period of a task is determined by the performance and safety requirements of the application. In this paper, we address the problem of assigning harmonic periods to a task set such that every task gets assigned an integer period less than or equal to its application specified upper bound and the task utilization of every task is less than 1. We focus on integer solutions given the discrete nature of time in real-time computer systems.
We first express this problem of assigning harmonic periods to a task set as a discrete piecewise optimization problem. We then present the 'Discrete Piecewise Harmonic Search' (DPHS) algorithm that outputs an optimal harmonic task assignment. We then define conditions for a metric to be rational for harmonization. We show that commonly used metrics like, the total percentage error (TPE), total system utilization (TSU), first order error (FOE), and maximum percentage error (MPE), are rational. We next prove that the DPHS algorithm finds the optimal feasible assignment, if one exists, for these rational metrics. We apply the DPHS algorithm to harmonize task sets used in real-world applications to highlight its benefits. We compare the performance of the DPHS algorithm against a brute-force search and find that the DPHS searches up to 94\% fewer task sets than the brute-force search that obtains the optimal solution.
Comments: 10 pages
Subjects: Systems and Control (eess.SY); Performance (cs.PF); Robotics (cs.RO)
ACM classes: C.4
Cite as: arXiv:2302.03724 [eess.SY]
  (or arXiv:2302.03724v1 [eess.SY] for this version)

Submission history

From: Anand Ganpat Bhat [view email]
[v1] Tue, 7 Feb 2023 19:32:27 GMT (717kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.