We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.

Portfolio Management

New submissions

[ total of 3 entries: 1-3 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

New submissions for Wed, 19 Jan 22

[1]  arXiv:2201.05709 [pdf, other]
Title: How easy is it for investment managers to deploy their talent in green and brown stocks?
Subjects: Portfolio Management (q-fin.PM); General Economics (econ.GN); General Finance (q-fin.GN)

We explore the realized alpha-performance heterogeneity in green and brown stocks' universes using the peer performance ratios of Ardia and Boudt (2018). Focusing on S&P 500 index firms over 2014-2020 and defining peer groups in terms of firms' greenhouse gas emission levels, we find that, on average, about 20% of the stocks differentiate themselves from their peers in terms of future performance. We see a much higher time-variation in this opportunity set within brown stocks. Furthermore, the performance heterogeneity has decreased over time, especially for green stocks, implying that it is now more difficult for investment managers to deploy their skills when choosing among low-GHG intensity stocks.

[2]  arXiv:2201.06183 [pdf, other]
Title: Internal multi-portfolio rebalancing processes: Linking resource allocation models and biproportional matrix techniques to portfolio management
Comments: 62 pages, 3 figures, comments welcome
Subjects: Portfolio Management (q-fin.PM); Mathematical Finance (q-fin.MF)

This paper describes multi-portfolio `internal' rebalancing processes used in the finance industry. Instead of trading with the market to `externally' rebalance, these internal processes detail how portfolio managers buy and sell between their portfolios to rebalance. We give an overview of currently used internal rebalancing processes, including one known as the `banker' process and another known as the `linear' process. We prove the banker process disadvantages the nominated banker portfolio in volatile markets, while the linear process may advantage or disadvantage portfolios.
We describe an alternative process that uses the concept of `market-invariance'. We give analytic solutions for small cases, while in general show that the $n$-portfolio solution and its corresponding `market-invariant' algorithm solve a system of nonlinear polynomial equations. It turns out this algorithm is a rediscovery of the RAS algorithm (also called the `iterative proportional fitting procedure') for biproportional matrices. We show that this process is more equitable than the banker and linear processes, and demonstrate this with empirical results.
The market-invariant process has already been implemented by industry due to the significance of these results.

[3]  arXiv:2201.06635 [pdf, other]
Title: Optimal trend following portfolios
Subjects: Portfolio Management (q-fin.PM)

This paper derives an optimal portfolio that is based on trend-following signal. Building on an earlier related article, it provides a unifying theoretical setting to introduce an autocorrelation model with the covariance matrix of trends and risk premia. We specify practically relevant models for the covariance matrix of trends. The optimal portfolio is decomposed into four basic components that yield four basic portfolios: Markowitz, risk parity, agnostic risk parity, and trend following on risk parity. The overperformance of the proposed optimal portfolio, applied to cross-asset trading universe, is confirmed by empirical backtests. We provide thus a unifying framework to describe and rationalize earlier developed portfolios.

[ total of 3 entries: 1-3 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Links to: arXiv, form interface, find, q-fin, recent, 2201, contact, help  (Access key information)