We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.

Applications

New submissions

[ total of 7 entries: 1-7 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

New submissions for Mon, 23 Nov 20

[1]  arXiv:2011.10398 [pdf, other]
Title: Probability bound analysis: A novel approach for quantifying parameter uncertainty in decision-analytic modeling and cost-effectiveness analysis
Authors: Rowan Iskandar
Comments: 17 pages, 4 figures
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Methodology (stat.ME)

Decisions about health interventions are often made using limited evidence. Mathematical models used to inform such decisions often include uncertainty analysis to account for the effect of uncertainty in the current evidence-base on decisional-relevant quantities. However, current uncertainty quantification methodologies require modelers to specify a precise probability distribution to represent the uncertainty of a model parameter. This study introduces a novel approach for propagating parameter uncertainty, probability bounds analysis (PBA), where the uncertainty about the unknown probability distribution of a model parameter is expressed in terms of an interval bounded by lower and upper bounds on the cumulative distribution function (p-box) and without assuming a particular form of the distribution function. We give the formulas of the p-boxes for common situations (given combinations of data on minimum, maximum, median, mean, or standard deviation), describe an approach to propagate p-boxes into a black-box mathematical model, and introduce an approach for decision-making based on the results of PBA. Then, we demonstrate an application of PBA using a case study. In sum, this study will provide modelers with tools to conduct parameter uncertainty quantification given constraints of available data with the fewest number of assumptions.

Cross-lists for Mon, 23 Nov 20

[2]  arXiv:2009.04843 (cross-list from q-bio.PE) [pdf, ps, other]
Title: Checking individuals and sampling populations with imperfect tests
Comments: 113 pages, 34 figures; R and JAGS code provided in Appendix (available for download from this http URL)
Subjects: Populations and Evolution (q-bio.PE); Applications (stat.AP)

In the last months, due to the emergency of Covid-19, questions related to the fact of belonging or not to a particular class of individuals (`infected or not infected'), after being tagged as `positive' or `negative' by a test, have never been so popular. Similarly, there has been strong interest in estimating the proportion of a population expected to hold a given characteristics (`having or having had the virus'). Taking the cue from the many related discussions on the media, in addition to those to which we took part, we analyze these questions from a probabilistic perspective (`Bayesian'), considering several effects that play a role in evaluating the probabilities of interest. The resulting paper, written with didactic intent, is rather general and not strictly related to pandemics: the basic ideas of Bayesian inference are introduced and the uncertainties on the performances of the tests are treated using the metrological concepts of `systematics', and are propagated into the quantities of interest following the rules of probability theory; the separation of `statistical' and `systematic' contributions to the uncertainty on the inferred proportion of infectees allows to optimize the sample size; the role of `priors', often overlooked, is stressed, however recommending the use of `flat priors', since the resulting posterior distribution can be `reshaped' by an `informative prior' in a later step; details on the calculations are given, also deriving useful approximated formulae, the tough work being however done with the help of direct Monte Carlo simulations and Markov Chain Monte Carlo, implemented in R and JAGS (relevant code provided in appendix).

[3]  arXiv:2011.10086 (cross-list from astro-ph.IM) [pdf]
Title: Evaluation of investigational paradigms for the discovery of non-canonical astrophysical phenomena
Comments: A product of the TechnoClimes 2020 conference
Subjects: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM); Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an); Applications (stat.AP)

Non-canonical phenomena - defined here as observables which are either insufficiently characterized by existing theory, or otherwise represent inconsistencies with prior observations - are of burgeoning interest in the field of astrophysics, particularly due to their relevance as potential signs of past and/or extant life in the universe (e.g. off-nominal spectroscopic data from exoplanets). However, an inherent challenge in investigating such phenomena is that, by definition, they do not conform to existing predictions, thereby making it difficult to constrain search parameters and develop an associated falsifiable hypothesis.
In this Expert Recommendation, the authors evaluate the suitability of two different approaches - conventional parameterized investigation (wherein experimental design is tailored to optimally test a focused, explicitly parameterized hypothesis of interest) and the alternative approach of anomaly searches (wherein broad-spectrum observational data is collected with the aim of searching for potential anomalies across a wide array of metrics) - in terms of their efficacy in achieving scientific objectives in this context. The authors provide guidelines on the appropriate use-cases for each paradigm, and contextualize the discussion through its applications to the interdisciplinary field of technosignatures (a discipline at the intersection of astrophysics and astrobiology), which essentially specializes in searching for non-canonical astrophysical phenomena.

Replacements for Mon, 23 Nov 20

[4]  arXiv:2011.04348 (replaced) [pdf]
Title: Forecasting asylum-related migration flows with machine learning and data at scale
Subjects: Applications (stat.AP); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
[5]  arXiv:1909.05142 (replaced) [pdf, other]
Title: Regularized deep learning with nonconvex penalties
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Applications (stat.AP); Computation (stat.CO)
[6]  arXiv:2005.13650 (replaced) [pdf, other]
Title: Group testing with nested pools
Comments: 23 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: Statistics Theory (math.ST); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Applications (stat.AP)
[7]  arXiv:2011.09325 (replaced) [pdf, other]
Title: Voxelwise principal component analysis of dynamic [S-methyl-11C]methionine PET data in glioma patients
Subjects: Medical Physics (physics.med-ph); Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Signal Processing (eess.SP); Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM); Applications (stat.AP)
[ total of 7 entries: 1-7 ]
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer | more ]

Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Links to: arXiv, form interface, find, stat, recent, 2011, contact, help  (Access key information)