Applications
New submissions
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer  more ]
New submissions for Mon, 23 Nov 20
 [1] arXiv:2011.10398 [pdf, other]

Title: Probability bound analysis: A novel approach for quantifying parameter uncertainty in decisionanalytic modeling and costeffectiveness analysisAuthors: Rowan IskandarComments: 17 pages, 4 figuresSubjects: Applications (stat.AP); Methodology (stat.ME)
Decisions about health interventions are often made using limited evidence. Mathematical models used to inform such decisions often include uncertainty analysis to account for the effect of uncertainty in the current evidencebase on decisionalrelevant quantities. However, current uncertainty quantification methodologies require modelers to specify a precise probability distribution to represent the uncertainty of a model parameter. This study introduces a novel approach for propagating parameter uncertainty, probability bounds analysis (PBA), where the uncertainty about the unknown probability distribution of a model parameter is expressed in terms of an interval bounded by lower and upper bounds on the cumulative distribution function (pbox) and without assuming a particular form of the distribution function. We give the formulas of the pboxes for common situations (given combinations of data on minimum, maximum, median, mean, or standard deviation), describe an approach to propagate pboxes into a blackbox mathematical model, and introduce an approach for decisionmaking based on the results of PBA. Then, we demonstrate an application of PBA using a case study. In sum, this study will provide modelers with tools to conduct parameter uncertainty quantification given constraints of available data with the fewest number of assumptions.
Crosslists for Mon, 23 Nov 20
 [2] arXiv:2009.04843 (crosslist from qbio.PE) [pdf, ps, other]

Title: Checking individuals and sampling populations with imperfect testsComments: 113 pages, 34 figures; R and JAGS code provided in Appendix (available for download from this http URL)Subjects: Populations and Evolution (qbio.PE); Applications (stat.AP)
In the last months, due to the emergency of Covid19, questions related to the fact of belonging or not to a particular class of individuals (`infected or not infected'), after being tagged as `positive' or `negative' by a test, have never been so popular. Similarly, there has been strong interest in estimating the proportion of a population expected to hold a given characteristics (`having or having had the virus'). Taking the cue from the many related discussions on the media, in addition to those to which we took part, we analyze these questions from a probabilistic perspective (`Bayesian'), considering several effects that play a role in evaluating the probabilities of interest. The resulting paper, written with didactic intent, is rather general and not strictly related to pandemics: the basic ideas of Bayesian inference are introduced and the uncertainties on the performances of the tests are treated using the metrological concepts of `systematics', and are propagated into the quantities of interest following the rules of probability theory; the separation of `statistical' and `systematic' contributions to the uncertainty on the inferred proportion of infectees allows to optimize the sample size; the role of `priors', often overlooked, is stressed, however recommending the use of `flat priors', since the resulting posterior distribution can be `reshaped' by an `informative prior' in a later step; details on the calculations are given, also deriving useful approximated formulae, the tough work being however done with the help of direct Monte Carlo simulations and Markov Chain Monte Carlo, implemented in R and JAGS (relevant code provided in appendix).
 [3] arXiv:2011.10086 (crosslist from astroph.IM) [pdf]

Title: Evaluation of investigational paradigms for the discovery of noncanonical astrophysical phenomenaAuthors: Caitlyn A. K. Singam, Jacob HaqqMisra, Amedeo Balbi, Alexander M. Sessa, Beatriz Villarroel, Gabriel G. De la Torre, David Grinspoon, Hikaru Furukawa, Virisha TimmarajuComments: A product of the TechnoClimes 2020 conferenceSubjects: Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astroph.IM); Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astroph.EP); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.dataan); Applications (stat.AP)
Noncanonical phenomena  defined here as observables which are either insufficiently characterized by existing theory, or otherwise represent inconsistencies with prior observations  are of burgeoning interest in the field of astrophysics, particularly due to their relevance as potential signs of past and/or extant life in the universe (e.g. offnominal spectroscopic data from exoplanets). However, an inherent challenge in investigating such phenomena is that, by definition, they do not conform to existing predictions, thereby making it difficult to constrain search parameters and develop an associated falsifiable hypothesis.
In this Expert Recommendation, the authors evaluate the suitability of two different approaches  conventional parameterized investigation (wherein experimental design is tailored to optimally test a focused, explicitly parameterized hypothesis of interest) and the alternative approach of anomaly searches (wherein broadspectrum observational data is collected with the aim of searching for potential anomalies across a wide array of metrics)  in terms of their efficacy in achieving scientific objectives in this context. The authors provide guidelines on the appropriate usecases for each paradigm, and contextualize the discussion through its applications to the interdisciplinary field of technosignatures (a discipline at the intersection of astrophysics and astrobiology), which essentially specializes in searching for noncanonical astrophysical phenomena.
Replacements for Mon, 23 Nov 20
 [4] arXiv:2011.04348 (replaced) [pdf]

Title: Forecasting asylumrelated migration flows with machine learning and data at scaleSubjects: Applications (stat.AP); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
 [5] arXiv:1909.05142 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Regularized deep learning with nonconvex penaltiesSubjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Applications (stat.AP); Computation (stat.CO)
 [6] arXiv:2005.13650 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Group testing with nested poolsComments: 23 pages, 2 figuresSubjects: Statistics Theory (math.ST); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.dataan); Quantitative Methods (qbio.QM); Applications (stat.AP)
 [7] arXiv:2011.09325 (replaced) [pdf, other]

Title: Voxelwise principal component analysis of dynamic [Smethyl11C]methionine PET data in glioma patientsAuthors: Corentin Martens, Olivier Debeir, Christine Decaestecker, Thierry Metens, Laetitia Lebrun, Gil LeurquinSterk, Nicola Trotta, Serge Goldman, Gaetan Van SimaeysSubjects: Medical Physics (physics.medph); Image and Video Processing (eess.IV); Signal Processing (eess.SP); Quantitative Methods (qbio.QM); Applications (stat.AP)
[ showing up to 2000 entries per page: fewer  more ]
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
Links to: arXiv, form interface, find, stat, recent, 2011, contact, help (Access key information)