We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME
< prev | next >
new | recent | 1202

Change to browse by:

stat

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Frasian Inference

Authors: Larry Wasserman
(Submitted on 3 Feb 2012)
Abstract: Don Fraser has given an interesting account of the agreements and disagreements between Bayesian posterior probabilities and confidence levels. In this comment I discuss some cases where the lack of such agreement is extreme. I then discuss a few cases where it is possible to have Bayes procedures with frequentist validity. Such frequentist-Bayesian---or Frasian---methods deserve more attention [arXiv:1112.5582].
Comments: Published in at this http URL the Statistical Science (this http URL) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (this http URL)
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Journal reference: Statistical Science 2011, Vol. 26, No. 3, 322-325
DOI: 10.1214/11-STS352C
Report number: IMS-STS-STS352C
Cite as: arXiv:1202.0633 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:1202.0633v1 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Larry Wasserman [view email]
[v1] Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:16:16 GMT (47kb)
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.