We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

hep-ph

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Title: Why gauge symmetry?

Authors: J. Gegelia
Abstract: It is argued that the Weinberg-Salam model is the way it is because the most general self-consistent effective field theory of massive vector bosons interacting with fermions and photons at leading order coincides with the Weinberg-Salam model in unitary gauge where the scalar field is replaced by its vacuum expectation value. To support this argument the most general Lorentz-invariant effective Lagrangian of massive vector bosons coupled to massless fermions is considered. Restrictions imposed on the interaction terms following from the consistency with the constraints of the second class and the perturbative renormalizability in the sense of effective field theories is analyzed. It is shown that the leading order effective Lagrangian containing interaction terms with dimensionless coupling constants coincides with the leading order effective Lagrangian of the locally invariant Yang-Mills theory up to globally invariant mass term of the vector bosons. Including the fermion masses and mixings and the interaction with the electromagnetic field leads to an effective field theory which at leading order looks like as if it was an $SU(2)\times U(1)$ gauge invariant theory with spontaneous symmetry breaking in unitary gauge with the scalar field replaced by its vacuum expectation value.
Comments: 23 pages, 2 figures
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph); High Energy Physics - Theory (hep-th)
Cite as: arXiv:1207.0156 [hep-ph]
  (or arXiv:1207.0156v1 [hep-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Jambul Gegelia [view email]
[v1] Sat, 30 Jun 2012 21:57:35 GMT (80kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.