Current browse context:
math-ph
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Mathematical Physics
Title: Peierls substitution for magnetic Bloch bands
(Submitted on 20 Dec 2013 (this version), latest version 1 Mar 2016 (v3))
Abstract: We consider the one-particle Schro\"odinger operator in two dimensions with a periodic potential and a strong constant magnetic field perturbed by slowly varying non-periodic scalar and vector potentials, $\phi(\epsilon x)$ and $A(\epsilon x)$, for $\epsilon\ll 1$. For each isolated family of magnetic Bloch bands we derive an effective Hamiltonian that is unitarily equivalent to the restriction of the Schro\"odinger operator to a corresponding almost invariant subspace. At leading order, our effective Hamiltonian can be interpreted as the Peierls substitution Hamiltonian widely used in physics for non-magnetic Bloch bands. However, while for non-magnetic Bloch bands the corresponding result is well understood, both on a heuristic and on a rigorous level, for magnetic Bloch bands it is not clear how to even define a Peierls substitution Hamiltonian beyond a formal expression. The source of the difficulty is a topological obstruction: In contrast to the non-magnetic case, magnetic Bloch bundles are generically not trivializable. Thus, Peierls substitution Hamiltonians for magnetic Bloch bands turn out to be pseudo-differential operators acting on sections of non-trivial vector bundles over a two-torus, the reduced Brillouin zone. Part of our contribution is the construction of a suitable Weyl calculus for such operators. As an application we construct a family of canonical one-band Hamiltonians $H_\theta$ for magnetic Bloch bands with Chern number $\theta\in\mathbb{Z}$ that generalizes the Hofstadter model $H_{\theta=0}$ for a single non-magnetic Bloch band. It turns out that the spectrum of $H_\theta$ is independent of $\theta$ and thus agrees with the Hofstadter spectrum depicted in his famous (black and white) butterfly. However, the resulting Chern numbers of subbands, corresponding to Hall conductivities, depend on $\theta$, and thus the models lead to different colored butterflies.
Submission history
From: Stefan Teufel [view email][v1] Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:05:18 GMT (1366kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 29 Apr 2015 14:19:37 GMT (2419kb,D)
[v3] Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:39:24 GMT (2419kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.