We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

hep-ph

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Title: Could the $X(3915)$ and the $X(3930)$ Be the Same Tensor State?

Abstract: By using a combined amplitude analysis of the $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow D\bar{D}$ and $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow J/\psi\omega$ data, we demonstrate that the $X(3915)$, which is quoted as a $J^{PC}=0^{++}$ state in the Particle Data Group table, is favored by the data to be a $J^{PC}=2^{++}$ state appearing in both channels, which means that the $X(3915)$ and the $X(3930)$ can be regarded as the same $J^{PC}=2^{++}$ state. Meanwhile, the data also prefer a large helicity-0 contribution of this tensor resonance to the amplitudes instead of the helicity-2 dominance assumed by {\it BABAR}, which may indicate a sizable portion of non-$q\bar q$ components in this state. Identifying the $X(3915)$ with the $X(3930)$ and abandoning the helicity-2 dominance for this tensor state are helpful for the further understandings of the properties of this state and also of the mysterious "$XYZ$" charmoniumlike resonances.
Comments: 5 pages, 1 table, 3 figures, version accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. Lett.; Title changed, significantly improved discussions, minor corrections to formulas and figures, main framework and results not changed
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Phenomenology (hep-ph); High Energy Physics - Experiment (hep-ex)
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 022001 (2015)
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.022001
Cite as: arXiv:1501.00879 [hep-ph]
  (or arXiv:1501.00879v2 [hep-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Zhiguang Xiao [view email]
[v1] Mon, 5 Jan 2015 14:33:40 GMT (153kb)
[v2] Fri, 26 Jun 2015 06:17:08 GMT (154kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.