Current browse context:
cs.LG
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Computer Science > Machine Learning
Title: A Theoretical Framework for Robustness of (Deep) Classifiers against Adversarial Examples
(Submitted on 1 Dec 2016 (v1), last revised 27 Sep 2017 (this version, v12))
Abstract: Most machine learning classifiers, including deep neural networks, are vulnerable to adversarial examples. Such inputs are typically generated by adding small but purposeful modifications that lead to incorrect outputs while imperceptible to human eyes. The goal of this paper is not to introduce a single method, but to make theoretical steps towards fully understanding adversarial examples. By using concepts from topology, our theoretical analysis brings forth the key reasons why an adversarial example can fool a classifier ($f_1$) and adds its oracle ($f_2$, like human eyes) in such analysis. By investigating the topological relationship between two (pseudo)metric spaces corresponding to predictor $f_1$ and oracle $f_2$, we develop necessary and sufficient conditions that can determine if $f_1$ is always robust (strong-robust) against adversarial examples according to $f_2$. Interestingly our theorems indicate that just one unnecessary feature can make $f_1$ not strong-robust, and the right feature representation learning is the key to getting a classifier that is both accurate and strong-robust.
Submission history
From: Yanjun Qi Dr. [view email][v1] Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:20:39 GMT (978kb,D)
[v2] Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:07:35 GMT (1311kb,D)
[v3] Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:23:55 GMT (2899kb,D)
[v4] Sat, 21 Jan 2017 16:37:24 GMT (2908kb,D)
[v5] Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:32:06 GMT (2918kb,D)
[v6] Wed, 1 Feb 2017 17:30:50 GMT (2922kb,D)
[v7] Thu, 2 Feb 2017 14:39:50 GMT (2922kb,D)
[v8] Fri, 3 Feb 2017 16:06:39 GMT (2924kb,D)
[v9] Mon, 27 Feb 2017 20:18:26 GMT (3233kb,D)
[v10] Thu, 9 Mar 2017 22:00:56 GMT (3218kb,D)
[v11] Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:36:40 GMT (3029kb,D)
[v12] Wed, 27 Sep 2017 16:02:48 GMT (3236kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.