References & Citations
Mathematical Physics
Title: Spacetimes as topological spaces, and the need to take methods of general topology more seriously
(Submitted on 15 Apr 2018 (v1), last revised 15 Nov 2018 (this version, v5))
Abstract: Why is the manifold topology in a spacetime taken for granted? Why do we prefer to use Riemann open balls as basic-open sets, while there also exists a Lorentz metric? Which topology is a best candidate for a spacetime; a topology sufficient for the description of spacetime singularities or a topology which incorporates the causal structure? Or both? Is it more preferable to have a topology with as many physical properties as possible, whose description might be complicated and counterintuitive, or a topology which can be described via a countable basis but misses some important information? These are just a few from the questions that we ask in this Chapter, which serves as a critical review of the terrain and contains a survey with remarks, corrections and open questions.
Submission history
From: Kyriakos Papadopoulos [view email][v1] Sun, 15 Apr 2018 20:11:36 GMT (12kb)
[v2] Sat, 28 Apr 2018 11:00:17 GMT (14kb)
[v3] Sun, 13 May 2018 13:59:54 GMT (14kb)
[v4] Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:01:30 GMT (14kb)
[v5] Thu, 15 Nov 2018 19:53:05 GMT (14kb)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.