Current browse context:
physics
Change to browse by:
References & Citations
Physics > History and Philosophy of Physics
Title: Naturalness, Extra-Empirical Theory Assessments, and the Implications of Skepticism
(Submitted on 19 Jun 2018 (v1), last revised 5 Sep 2018 (this version, v3))
Abstract: Naturalness is an extra-empirical quality that aims to assess plausibility of a theory. Finetuning measures are often deputized to quantify the task. However, knowing statistical distributions on parameters appears necessary. Such meta-theories are not known yet. A critical discussion of these issues is presented, including their possible resolutions in fixed points. Both agreement to and skepticism of naturalness's utility remains credible, as is skepticism to any extra-empirical theory assessment (SEETA) that claims to identify "more correct" theories that are equally empirically adequate. The severe implications of SEETA are set forward in some detail. We conclude with a summary and discussion of the viability of three main viewpoints toward naturalness and fine-tuning, where the "moderate naturalness position" is suggested to be most appealing, not suffering from the disquietudes of the extreme pro- and anti-naturalness positions.
Submission history
From: James Wells [view email][v1] Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:43:21 GMT (376kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:31:39 GMT (376kb,D)
[v3] Wed, 5 Sep 2018 16:51:38 GMT (379kb,D)
Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.