We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

physics.hist-ph

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Physics > History and Philosophy of Physics

Title: Science Under Attack

Abstract: Some attack scientific rationality, others defend it, but both miss the point. What both parties take to be scientific rationality is actually a species of irrationality masquerading as scientific rationality. The current orthodox conception of science, taken for granted by scientists and non-scientists alike, is irrational because it suppresses problematic assumptions, inherent in the aims of science, having to do with metaphysics, values, and political and social issues. We urgently need a more rigorous conception of science to be adopted and implemented that honestly acknowledges the problematic character of the aims of science, and seeks to improve them as science proceeds.
Comments: 5 pages. This paper argues that the conception of science taken for granted by the scientific community is irrational. We need a more rigorous conception - and kind - of science that is more honest about the problematic aims of science
Subjects: History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)
Journal reference: The Philosophers' Magazine Issue 31, 3rd Quarter, 2005, pp. 37-41
Cite as: arXiv:2001.10416 [physics.hist-ph]
  (or arXiv:2001.10416v1 [physics.hist-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Nicholas Maxwell Mr [view email]
[v1] Thu, 12 Dec 2019 12:48:05 GMT (160kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.