We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

hep-lat

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

High Energy Physics - Lattice

Title: Nf=2+1 QCD thermodynamics with gradient flow using two-loop matching coefficients

Abstract: We study thermodynamic properties of Nf=2+1 QCD on the lattice adopting O(a)-improved Wilson quark action and Iwasaki gauge action. To cope with the problems due to explicit violation of the Poincare and chiral symmetries, we apply the Small Flow-time eXpansion (SFtX) method based on the gradient flow, which is a general method to correctly calculate any renormalized observables on the lattice. In this method, the matching coefficients in front of operators in the small flow-time expansion are calculated by perturbation theory. In a previous study using one-loop matching coefficients, we found that the SFtX method works well for the equation of state, chiral condensates and susceptibilities. In this paper, we study the effect of two-loop matching coefficients by Harlander et al. We also test the influence of the renormalization scale in the SFtX method. We find that, by adopting the mu_0 renormalization scale of Harlander et al. instead of the conventional mu_d=1/sqrt{8t} scale, the linear behavior at large t is improved so that we can perform the t -> 0 extrapolation of the SFtX method more confidently. In the calculation of the two-loop matching coefficients by Harlander et al., the equation of motion for quark fields was used. For the entropy density in which the equation of motion has no effects, we find that the results using the two-loop coefficients agree well with those using one-loop coefficients. On the other hand, for the trace anomaly which is affected by the equation of motion, we find discrepancies between the one- and two-loop results at high temperatures. By comparing the results of one-loop coefficients with and without using the equation of motion, the main origin of the discrepancies is suggested to be attributed to O((aT)^2)=O(1/N_t^2) discretization errors in the equation of motion at N_t =< 10.
Comments: 45 pages, 13 figures. Erratum included to the published version. Errors in Eqs. (50) and (51) as well as in Figs. 2-7, 10, and 12 corrected. See PhysRevD.102.059903 for details. Analyses have been done adopting the correct formulas, and thus the results and conclusions are unchanged
Subjects: High Energy Physics - Lattice (hep-lat)
Journal reference: Phys. Rev. D 102, 014510 (2020); Phys. Rev. D 102, 059903(E) (2020)
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.014510 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.059903
Report number: UTHEP-748, UTCCS-P-132, J-PARC-TH-0216, KYUSHU-HET-211
Cite as: arXiv:2005.00251 [hep-lat]
  (or arXiv:2005.00251v3 [hep-lat] for this version)

Submission history

From: Kazuyuki Kanaya [view email]
[v1] Fri, 1 May 2020 07:14:25 GMT (562kb,D)
[v2] Sun, 19 Jul 2020 14:24:34 GMT (561kb,D)
[v3] Thu, 1 Oct 2020 05:23:57 GMT (585kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.