We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

physics.flu-dyn

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Physics > Fluid Dynamics

Title: Modeling the Second Harmonic in Surface Water Waves Using Generalizations of NLS

Abstract: When a mechanical wavemaker at one end of a water-wave tank oscillates with a frequency, $\omega_0$, time series of downstream surface waves typically include the dominant frequency (or first harmonic), $\omega_0$, along with the second, $2\omega_0$; third, $3\omega_0$; and higher harmonics. This behavior is common for the propagation of weakly nonlinear waves with a narrow band of frequencies centered around the dominant frequency such as in the evolution of ocean swell, pulse propagation in optical fibers, and Langmuir waves in plasmas. Presented herein are measurements of the amplitudes of the first and second harmonic bands from four surface water wave laboratory experiments.
The Stokes expansion for small-amplitude surface water waves provides predictions for the amplitudes of the second and higher harmonics given the amplitude of the first harmonic. Similarly, the derivations of the NLS equation and its generalizations (models for the evolution of weakly nonlinear, narrow-banded waves) provide predictions for the second and third harmonic bands given measurements of the first harmonic band. We test the accuracy of these predictions by making two types of comparisons with the experimental measurements. First, we consider the evolution of the second harmonic band while neglecting all other harmonic bands. Second, we use explicit Stokes and generalized NLS formulas to predict the evolution of the second harmonic band using the first harmonic data as input. Comparisons of both types show reasonable agreement, though predictions obtained from dissipative generalizations of NLS consistently outperform the conservative ones. Finally, we show that the predictions obtained from these two methods are qualitatively different.
Subjects: Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn)
Cite as: arXiv:2008.09715 [physics.flu-dyn]
  (or arXiv:2008.09715v3 [physics.flu-dyn] for this version)

Submission history

From: John Carter [view email]
[v1] Fri, 21 Aug 2020 23:49:52 GMT (1081kb,D)
[v2] Fri, 5 Nov 2021 20:26:04 GMT (435kb)
[v3] Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:38:04 GMT (646kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.