We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

physics.hist-ph
< prev | next >
new | recent | 2009

Change to browse by:

gr-qc
physics

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Physics > History and Philosophy of Physics

Title: The Hole Argument

Authors: Oliver Pooley
(Submitted on 21 Sep 2020)
Abstract: This paper reviews the hole argument as an argument against spacetime substantivalism. After a careful presentation of the argument itself I review possible responses.
Comments: 23 pages, 0 figures. To be published in E. Knox and A. Wilson (eds), The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics
Subjects: History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph); General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc)
Cite as: arXiv:2009.09982 [physics.hist-ph]
  (or arXiv:2009.09982v1 [physics.hist-ph] for this version)

Submission history

From: Oliver Pooley [view email]
[v1] Mon, 21 Sep 2020 16:07:21 GMT (21kb)
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.