We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:


Current browse context:


Change to browse by:

References & Citations


(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Statistics > Machine Learning

Title: Better scalability under potentially heavy-tailed feedback

Abstract: We study scalable alternatives to robust gradient descent (RGD) techniques that can be used when the losses and/or gradients can be heavy-tailed, though this will be unknown to the learner. The core technique is simple: instead of trying to robustly aggregate gradients at each step, which is costly and leads to sub-optimal dimension dependence in risk bounds, we instead focus computational effort on robustly choosing (or newly constructing) a strong candidate based on a collection of cheap stochastic sub-processes which can be run in parallel. The exact selection process depends on the convexity of the underlying objective, but in all cases, our selection technique amounts to a robust form of boosting the confidence of weak learners. In addition to formal guarantees, we also provide empirical analysis of robustness to perturbations to experimental conditions, under both sub-Gaussian and heavy-tailed data, along with applications to a variety of benchmark datasets. The overall take-away is an extensible procedure that is simple to implement, trivial to parallelize, which keeps the formal merits of RGD methods but scales much better to large learning problems.
Comments: This work merges arXiv:2006.00784 and arXiv:2006.01364, providing additional empirical analysis using real-world benchmark datasets
Subjects: Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2012.07346 [stat.ML]
  (or arXiv:2012.07346v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

Submission history

From: Matthew J. Holland [view email]
[v1] Mon, 14 Dec 2020 08:56:04 GMT (373kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.