We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

stat.ME

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Statistics > Methodology

Title: Retarded kernels for longitudinal survival analysis and dynamic prediction

Abstract: Predicting patient survival probabilities based on observed covariates is an important assessment in clinical practice. These patient-specific covariates are often measured over multiple follow-up appointments. It is then of interest to predict survival based on the history of these longitudinal measurements, and to update predictions as more observations become available. The standard approaches to these so-called `dynamic prediction' assessments are joint models and landmark analysis. Joint models involve high-dimensional parametrisations, and their computational complexity often prohibits including multiple longitudinal covariates. Landmark analysis is simpler, but discards a proportion of the available data at each `landmark time'. In this work we propose a `retarded kernel' approach to dynamic prediction that sits somewhere in between the two standard methods in terms of complexity. By conditioning hazard rates directly on the covariate measurements over the observation time frame, we define a model that takes into account the full history of covariate measurements but is more practical and parsimonious than joint modelling. Time-dependent association kernels describe the impact of covariate changes at earlier times on the patient's hazard rate at later times. Under the constraints that our model (i) reduces to the standard Cox model for time-independent covariates, and (ii) contains the instantaneous Cox model as a special case, we derive two natural kernel parameterisations. Upon application to three clinical data sets, we find that the predictive accuracy of the retarded kernel approach is comparable to that of the two existing standard methods.
Comments: 21 pages, 10 figures
Subjects: Methodology (stat.ME)
Cite as: arXiv:2110.11196 [stat.ME]
  (or arXiv:2110.11196v2 [stat.ME] for this version)

Submission history

From: Annabel Davies [view email]
[v1] Thu, 21 Oct 2021 15:09:03 GMT (1850kb,D)
[v2] Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:39:53 GMT (1942kb)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.