We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cs.CR

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

DBLP - CS Bibliography

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo ScienceWISE logo

Computer Science > Cryptography and Security

Title: New Datasets for Dynamic Malware Classification

Abstract: Nowadays, malware and malware incidents are increasing daily, even with various anti-viruses systems and malware detection or classification methodologies. Many static, dynamic, and hybrid techniques have been presented to detect malware and classify them into malware families. Dynamic and hybrid malware classification methods have advantages over static malware classification methods by being highly efficient. Since it is difficult to mask malware behavior while executing than its underlying code in static malware classification, machine learning techniques have been the main focus of the security experts to detect malware and determine their families dynamically. The rapid increase of malware also brings the necessity of recent and updated datasets of malicious software. We introduce two new, updated datasets in this work: One with 9,795 samples obtained and compiled from VirusSamples and the one with 14,616 samples from VirusShare. This paper also analyzes multi-class malware classification performance of the balanced and imbalanced version of these two datasets by using Histogram-based gradient boosting, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and XGBoost models with API call-based dynamic malware classification. Results show that Support Vector Machine, achieves the highest score of 94% in the imbalanced VirusSample dataset, whereas the same model has 91% accuracy in the balanced VirusSample dataset. While XGBoost, one of the most common gradient boosting-based models, achieves the highest score of 90% and 80%.in both versions of the VirusShare dataset. This paper also presents the baseline results of VirusShare and VirusSample datasets by using the four most widely known machine learning techniques in dynamic malware classification literature. We believe that these two datasets and baseline results enable researchers in this field to test and validate their methods and approaches.
Comments: 5 pages, 2 figures, 6 tables
Subjects: Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2111.15205 [cs.CR]
  (or arXiv:2111.15205v1 [cs.CR] for this version)

Submission history

From: Berkant Düzgün [view email]
[v1] Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:31:16 GMT (1393kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.