We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

cond-mat.soft

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Condensed Matter > Soft Condensed Matter

Title: Comparison of Shear and Compression Jammed Packings of Frictional Disks

Abstract: We compare the structural and mechanical properties of mechanically stable (MS) packings of frictional disks in two spatial dimensions (2D) generated with isotropic compression and simple shear protocols from discrete element modeling (DEM) simulations. We find that the average contact number and packing fraction at jamming onset are similar (with relative deviations $< 0.5\%$) for MS packings generated via compression and shear. In contrast, the average stress anisotropy $\langle {\hat \Sigma}_{xy} \rangle = 0$ for MS packings generated via isotropic compression, whereas $\langle {\hat \Sigma}_{xy} \rangle >0$ for MS packings generated via simple shear. To investigate the difference in the stress state of MS packings, we develop packing-generation protocols to first unjam the MS packings, remove the frictional contacts, and then rejam them. Using these protocols, we are able to obtain rejammed packings with nearly identical particle positions and stress anisotropy distributions compared to the original jammed packings. However, we find that when we directly compare the original jammed packings and rejammed ones, there are finite stress anisotropy deviations $\Delta {\hat \Sigma}_{xy}$. The deviations are smaller than the stress anisotropy fluctuations obtained by enumerating the force solutions within the null space of the contact networks generated via the DEM simulations. These results emphasize that even though the compression and shear jamming protocols generate packings with the same contact networks, there can be residual differences in the normal and tangential forces at each contact, and thus differences in the stress anisotropy.
Comments: 11 pages, 11 figures
Subjects: Soft Condensed Matter (cond-mat.soft)
Journal reference: Granular Matter 21 (2019) 109
Cite as: arXiv:1906.00438 [cond-mat.soft]
  (or arXiv:1906.00438v1 [cond-mat.soft] for this version)

Submission history

From: Corey S. O'Hern [view email]
[v1] Sun, 2 Jun 2019 16:30:01 GMT (4377kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.