We gratefully acknowledge support from
the Simons Foundation and member institutions.
Full-text links:

Download:

Current browse context:

math.AT

Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Bookmark

(what is this?)
CiteULike logo BibSonomy logo Mendeley logo del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo

Mathematics > Algebraic Topology

Title: How is a graph not like a manifold?

Abstract: For an equivariantly formal action of a compact torus $T$ on a smooth manifold $X$ with isolated fixed points we investigate the global homological properties of the graded poset $S(X)$ of face submanifolds. We prove that the condition of $j$-independency of tangent weights at each fixed point implies $(j+1)$-acyclicity of the skeleta $S(X)_r$ for $r>j+1$. This result provides a necessary topological condition for a GKM graph to be a GKM graph of some GKM manifold. We use particular acyclicity arguments to describe the equivariant cohomology algebra of an equivariantly formal manifold of dimension $2n$ with an $(n-1)$-independent action of $(n-1)$-dimensional torus, under certain colorability assumptions on its GKM graph. This description relates the equivariant cohomology algebra to the face algebra of a simplicial poset. Such observation underlines certain similarity between actions of complexity one and torus manifolds.
Comments: 23 pages, 3 figures. In v2 we changed the second part of the paper (on the relation between complexity 1 and 0). To clarify the arguments we sacrificed generality: now in Theorem 2 we require GKM graph to bipartite
Subjects: Algebraic Topology (math.AT); K-Theory and Homology (math.KT)
MSC classes: 57S12, 55N91, 13F55, 06A06 (Primary) 55P91, 55U10, 55T25, 57R91, 13H10, 55R20 (Secondary)
Cite as: arXiv:2203.10641 [math.AT]
  (or arXiv:2203.10641v2 [math.AT] for this version)

Submission history

From: Anton Ayzenberg [view email]
[v1] Sun, 20 Mar 2022 20:38:49 GMT (20kb)
[v2] Thu, 27 Apr 2023 09:50:35 GMT (30kb,D)

Link back to: arXiv, form interface, contact.